Study Set Content:
21- Flashcard

Back v The Master

Draft will prepared by attorney then approved by T, but more info still to be given later .T dies before info can be given and before signing anything

Click To Flip the Card
22- Flashcard

What is the supreme clarified case law position.

Bekker v Naude

Click To Flip the Card
23- Flashcard

Bekker v Naude

Where no formalities have been complied with and we are dealing with a mere draft/document, document must be PERSONALLY drafted by T.

Click To Flip the Card
24- Flashcard

Dictating of will?

Form of personal drafting.

Click To Flip the Card
25- Flashcard

What about where will is partially executed.

Raubenheimer v Raubenheimer

Click To Flip the Card
26- Flashcard

Raubenheimer v Raubenheimer

Here there was partial compliance. Document drafted by financial advisor and signed by T but no witnesses had signed.

Document can then be condoned

Click To Flip the Card
27- Flashcard

Third requirement for condonation of will?

Document must have been intended to be T’s will.

Click To Flip the Card
28- Flashcard

If document reflect mere instructions...

cannot be condoned

Click To Flip the Card
29- Flashcard

Intention must exist at

time of drafting or personal execution; cannot be formed at a later stage

Click To Flip the Card
30- Flashcard

How is intention determined..

Looking at document and surrounding circumstances.

Click To Flip the Card
31- Flashcard

Case law for intention:

Ex Parte Maurice; Van Wetten; De Rescke; Dryden

Click To Flip the Card
32- Flashcard

Ex Parte Maurice

Document written in T’s own handwriting but not signed by T or witnesses.

T sent the document (containing his wishes ito his estate upon death) under covering letter to his business colleague and asked colleague to send to his attorney to “knock document into shape, put into legal jargon and send back for my approval.

Court held

In this case: document intended to convey instructions for drafting of final will

Not intended to be final will

Cannot be condoned

Click To Flip the Card
33- Flashcard

Van Wetten v Bosch (SCA)

Also involved a letter sent to attorney but letter included “… as of today the 5th of September this is my will to be followed”...T later died of illness

Court held:

Words do not indicate instructions but rather final will.

This enquiry entails an examination of the document itself and also of the document in the context of the surrounding circumstances

Click To Flip the Card
34- Flashcard

Dryden v Harrison

Case involved an email sent to Ms Dryden . Nature of document not important to establish intention.

Court held

No intention found

How? Looked at document and surrounding circumstances; found deceased to be a careful and meticulous person making it unlikely that he would have intended email to be last will

Another will (formalities complied with) had also already been drafted

Click To Flip the Card
35- Flashcard

Final Decision

If there is intention for letter to be final will and not just instructions. Will can be condoned.

Click To Flip the Card
thumb_up_alt Subscribers
layers 35 Items
folder Law Category
0.00
0 Reviews
Share It Now!